Shelton Highclimbers Fastpitch Booster Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933845913
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Shelton, WA, USA
Phone
3607919030
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Reported finances

Revenue
$15,804
Expenses
$8,227
Assets
$29,499
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Aimee Rowland (President)
  • Stephanie Schauffenhauer (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Aimee Rowland (President)
  • Karen Lee (Treasurer)
  • Stephanie Schauffenhauer (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Designed to exclusively support the Shelton High School (SHS) fastpitch program and as such will support the following purposes. 1. To motivate and sustain interest of parents, players, SHS student body and members of the community to support SHFBC. 2. To lend all possible support, both moral and financial, to the activities of SHFBC within the guidelines specified by the school district, the SHS staff administration, SHS athletic director and the SHS fastpitch coaching staff. 3. To participate, in cooperation with the SHS athletic director, head fastpitch coach or his designated coaching staff in activities designed or conducted to promote the SHS fastpitch program.

What it reported doing in 2025

We held a skills camp for local youth fastpitch players lead and hosted by current varsity players. 40 girls signed up and 20 players volunteered

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 79
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 47.9%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.59; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 16% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 49.2% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.