Shelter Us Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 333816054
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Cheyenne, WY, USA
- Phone
- 3072871401
- Rating
- 64
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $130,050
- Expenses
- $103,083
- Assets
- $31,243
- Liabilities
- $4,276
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIM SCORIC (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIM SCORIC (PRESIDENT)
- SHARI WEST (SECRETARY/DI)
- AUBREY EDWARDS (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A Wyoming where people have access to stable, affordable housing within the communities they serve, now and for future generations to come. Wyoming neighbors for housing foundation builds grassroots leadership and advocates for housing policies that expand access to affordable housing and strengthen communties across Wyoming.
What it reported doing in 2025
In the first year, Wyoming neighbors for housing foundation focused primarily on establishing the organization as a recognized 501(c)(3) and building a strong volunteer base. The application was approved by the IRS in the fall of 2025, and Wyoming neighbors for housing foundation continues to engage individuals who are passionate about housing by providing meaningful opportunities to contribute to this work in the future.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 67.1%; rating input score 67
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.7%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 33.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 67.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 18/100.