Shelby Whippet Performing Arts Boosters Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993222866
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Shelby, OH, USA
- Phone
- 4196316793
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,402
- Expenses
- $34,031
- Assets
- $102,538
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JENNIFER STEELE-REHBERG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VALERIE BARNHART (TREASURER)
- JENNIFER STEELE-REHBERG (PRESIDENT)
- JEFF SECRISKEY (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
This corporation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, pursuant to the provisions of the nonprofit public benefit corporation law of the state of Ohio. To establish and maintain an organization that is legally and fiscally responsible in aiding and supporting the shelby whippet performing arts (grades 6-12).
What it reported doing in 2024
The purpose of the shelby whippet performing arts boosters, inc shall be to serve and support the students and promote the activities of the shelby city schools performing arts, grades 6-12 (instrumental music, choral music, and theatre). To lend all possible financial, moral, organizational, logistical and personnel support to the shelby whippet performing arts. To advance the education of the youth involved by promoting and encouraging musical excellence, teamwork and cooperation in an environment of mutual respect and dignity.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 89% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 52.8%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 96.8%; rating input score 97
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 45.5%; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.01; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 52.8% of revenue deployed · 96.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $33K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.