Shelby Township Police Benevolent Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
933090910
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Shelby Twp, MI, USA
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Philanthropy, Charity, Voluntarism Promotion

Reported finances

Revenue
$73,521
Expenses
$41,693
Assets
$89,269

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Patrick Barnard (President)
  • Jason Schmittler (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Robert Shelide (Chair)
  • Patrick Barnard (President)
  • Jason Schmittler (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Shelby Township Police Department Benevolent Association is a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting the families of police officers who have been injured or killed in the line of duty. Through community fundraising events and charitable contributions the association provides financial assistance to help cover essential needs such as medical expenses funeral costs and transitional support. Its mission is to honor the service and sacrifice of law enforcement personnel by offering meaningful aid to their loved ones during times of hardship.

What it reported doing in 2025

3. Community Fundraising Events To sustain its charitable programs the Association organized several fundraising events including a major golf outing and multiple raffles. These events engaged hundreds of community members and raised over 63,000 in gross proceeds. Funds were used to support direct aid programs and build awareness of the sacrifices made by local law enforcement. The dpt. donated to a dispatcher whose son committed suicide 22,277.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.3%; rating input score 45
  • Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 43.3%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.14; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 99.2% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 43.4% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.3% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $33K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 7 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.