Shelby County Tennessee Sheriffs Assistance Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824625036
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Memphis, TN, USA
- Phone
- 9012225591
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Law Enforcement
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,556
- Expenses
- $24,947
- Assets
- $30,886
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cliff Lafferty (President)
People named in this filing
- Alicia Lindsey (Corporate Officer)
- Gordon Olswing (Secretary)
- Cliff Lafferty (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support our sponsored schools with the objective of assisting the students attending, education students as to the efforts and operations of Shelby County Sheriff's Office while increasing relations with the students and the local community as a whole.
What it reported doing in 2025
Northaven Elementary School - Test scores/Achievement significant increase - Pizza Party Celebration for the Students Support Events related to Breast Cancer Awareness Pipe & Drum for Ceremonial Supplies Support to Vollentine Elementary to support students needs in the classroom
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 96
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 93.9%; rating input score 94
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.1%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.24; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -27.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 93.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 55/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.