Shelby County Counseling Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
161661840
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2018
Location
Sidney, OH, USA
Phone
9374928080
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$278,645
Expenses
$236,215
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUTH COOPER (BOARD PRESIDENT)
  • RANDY PURDY (BOARD VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • JULIE CLAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • JULIE CLAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $37,175 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To enhance the recovery journey and improve the quality of life for those in need of mental health and addiction support in shelby county and the surrounding areas.

What it reported doing in 2018

Treatment - includes outpatient services that diagnoses, treats and prevents mental illness. The center also plans, develops, implements, and coordinates a comprehensive system of programs and services for the prevention and treatment of alcohol abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse, and addiction.prevention - programs that provide for the awareness and knowledge of the nature and extent of alcohol, tobacco and other drug use, abuse and addiction and their effects on individuals, families and communities. Addiction and their effects on individuals, families and communities.intervention - the center operates a state-certified, seventy-two-hour residential program for first time ovi/dui offenders.the board of directors voted to cease operations and liquidate due to continuing losses and changes that make a return to sustainable operations unlikely.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 72
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.4%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.7%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -18.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -14.2% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.4% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $212K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $37K · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2009 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 25/100.