Shelburne Museum Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
030179436
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Shelburne, VT, USA
Phone
8029853346
Rating
67
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Museum, Museum Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,058,612
Expenses
$9,678,671
Assets
$61,637,712
Liabilities
$1,390,285

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

27 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PETER GRAHAM (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • THOMAS DENENBERG (EXECUTIVE DI): $373,323 total reported compensation
  • ERIN MOORE (DIRECTOR OF): $135,755 total reported compensation
  • BENJAMIN KREVOLIN (DIRECTOR OF): $124,724 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To broaden our audience, engage their curiosity, animate their creativity, and give them an extraordinary, educational museum experience.

What it reported doing in 2024

Operation of a museum of art and americana including impressionist paintings, folk art, quilts, textiles, decorative arts, furniture, american paintings and 17th to 20th century artifacts. During the year ended march 31, 2025, the museum's overall visitors totaled 136,413 including 28,349 school-aged children. Special exhibitions included: shelburne museum organizes and presents exhibitions and programs for the enrichment of the community. Each year the museum presents approximately ten to twelve rotating and permanent exhibitions. During the year 2025, shelburne museum presented the following rotating exhibitions: making a noise: indigenous sound art; sound, art, & ink: higher ground posters; herd: karen petersen's bronze horses; dahlov ipcar: the possibilities of pattern; blueprint of a collection: cyanotype photography of david sokosh; porcelain love letters: the art of mara superior; a grand spectacle in the great outdoors: elliot fernander's circus photography; circus poster selections from the permanent collection; rotating quilt installations from the permanent collection. Special programs: during the fiscal year 2025 in-person programming returned to prepandemic levels, building upon and expanding programs from fiscal year 2024. Shelburne museum hosted programs for the visually impaired and those with alzheimer's disease and dementia; school partnerships with public elementary, middle, and high schools; summer camps that specialized in art programming such as knitting and print making; yoga classes in partnership with a local studio; ongoing webinars regarding conservation efforts; and school programs for students pre-k through college, including underwriting of admission and transportation costs for schools upon request. Shelburne museum continued to host free admission events, including community day and free first fridays, which provides free admission to the public after 3pm on the first friday of every month during the season. This program welcomed a total of 8,609 visitors, 15 food & beverage vendors, and 4 live music performances. In 2025 shelburne museum continued offering sensory friendly fridays/times, to allow children and adults with sensory processing differences time to view special exhibitions in a light and sound adjusted environment. Shelburne museum plans to expand this initiative in the coming years. In addition, shelburne museum continued the winter lights programming, which is an outdoor lightshow & experience that runs from late november through january 1st. This event allows us to engage with our community members during the winter months. Winter lights continues to be an incredibly successful program, welcoming over 58,000 visitors in 2025.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 77% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 50
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 39.1%; rating input score 39
  • Program expense ratio: 66.8%; rating input score 67
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.37; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.7%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -0.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 39.1% of revenue deployed · 66.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 23 of 23 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $373K · 27 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.7M reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 52/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.