Sheboygan Dog Training Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391403944
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Sheboygan, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9204528788
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $109,018
- Expenses
- $79,348
- Assets
- $312,701
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT YUNK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT YUNK (PRESIDENT)
- BRYCE LANCOUR (VICE PRESIDE)
- MELISENDA AVDIC (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The object of this club shall be to promote the training of all breeds of dogs, to disseminate knowledge regarding training and dog ownership; to conduct classes for the training of dogs and their handlers; to encourage the training of judges and stewards; to hold and support obedience and agility trials, tests, exhibitions and matches under the rules and regulations of the american kennel club and other national dog organizations as stated in the sheboygan dog training club policies; and to promote cooperation and good sportsmanship among its members in training and exhibition of purebred dogs. We also provide demonstrations and visits to schools, nursing homes, etc. And participate in local parades.
What it reported doing in 2025
Maintain training facility, hold public classes, public demonstrations to promote the social benefits of training
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 72
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.2%; rating input score 50
- Program expense ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 71
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 27.2%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.94; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.8% per year; rating input score 0; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.3% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.2% of revenue deployed · 71.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.