She Sends Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 862259652
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Kentfield, CA, USA
- Phone
- 4154641815
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,773
- Expenses
- $43,578
- Assets
- $17,500
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Maggie Courtney (CEO)
People named in this filing
- Maggie Courtney (CEO)
- Kate Courtney (Secretary, CFO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To connect, support, and inspire women and girls through mountain biking.
What it reported doing in 2024
She Sends Foundation (Foundation") x NICA GRiT 2024 Initiative Recap: The Foundation supported 157 NICA GRiT [Girls Riding Together] outreach, retention, or coach development events at the team and league level. This initiative reached a minimum of 2500 girls and women. Beyond the individuals who the Foundation reached through these events, the grants helped the Foundation bring attention to the need for and impact of having a GRiT coach lead on every single NICA team. These are the coaches who are responsible for leading GRiT recruitment and retention efforts at the team level, which is critical to helping NICA scale quickly and bring more girls into the sport. To date, 1,176 coaches have completed the online GRiT CEU, which is designed to give coaches the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to recruit and retain more women and girls. As a result of all of this, NICA has increased female student-athlete participation by close to 1% this year, bringing our average participation to
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.3%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 77%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 4.8%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.4; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 73.3% of revenue deployed · 77% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $34K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 26/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.