She Did That Community Advocate Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 852211138
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Columbia, SC, USA
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,650
- Expenses
- $4,850
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Cortez Jones (President)
- Jamal Bradley (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Cortez Jones (President)
- Jamal Bradley (Vice President)
- Steffany Boyd (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At She Did That Community Advocate Foundation we empower emergency response efforts with compassion urgency and collaboration. We stay committed to supporting individuals and families in crisis by providing swift compassionate care fostering partnerships with local responders and community organizations and ensuring every person affected by emergency or trauma receives the support they need to begin rebuilding their lives. Through education preparedness and advocacy we create safer more resilient communities where no one is left behind. Teen & Young Adult Dating Violence Awareness Brunch The Teen & Young Adult Dating Violence Awareness Brunch was a youth-focused initiative that created a safe open space for teens young adults parents and advocates to have critical conversations about dating violence. This event: Educated youth on the early warning signs of unhealthy and abusive relationships. Empowered young people to set boundaries speak up and seek help.
What it reported doing in 2024
The 9th Annual Purple Gala The Purple Gala was our premier annual event dedicated to raising awareness about domestic violence sexual assault and sexual violence. It served as a powerful platform for survivors advocates and community leaders to: Share stories of survival and resilience. Educate the public on the warning signs available resources and ways to help. Honor survivors while remembering those lost to violence. Raise critical funds that directly supported emergency assistance for victims and their families including shelter transportation food clothing and counseling resources. Through live storytelling keynote speakers and community engagement the Purple Gala fostered solidarity empowerment and action ensuring domestic violence awareness remained at the forefront all year long.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filed totals do not add up and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 15
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -32.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -65.7% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -75% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 6 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III program expenses within total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.