Shc Foundation Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900805201
IRS 990 coverage
2015–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Seville, OH, USA
Phone
3307221900
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$241,379
Expenses
$116,988
Assets
$5,260,166
Liabilities
$90,612

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MICHAEL KISHA (PRESIDENT)
  • DON SPICKLER (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MELANIE KASTEN-KRAUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA)

Highest reported compensation

  • MICHAEL BEH (FINANCE DIRECTOR/TREASURER): $139,038 total reported compensation
  • MELANIE KASTEN-KRAUSE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETA): $100,453 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Shc foundation exists to support society for handicapped citizens of medina county, inc., which partners with individuals with disabilities and their families to provide a full range of servicesto assist them in living a quality of life in their chosen community. It is the goal of these organizations to provide opportunities for full inclusion for individuals with disabilities, to be active advocates, to be innovative in the field of developmental disabilities and to address the gaps in services in our communities. Society for handicapped citizens of medina county, inc. Has in the past, and expects to continue to provide support and care, training and adult education, supported employment, housing, and recreation to both children and adults with developmental and physical disabilities. Support and care, training and adult education, supported employment, housing, and recreation to both children and adults with developmental and physical disabilities.

What it reported doing in 2024

Support of society for handicapped citizens of medina county andits stated mission

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 84% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and some related-organization disclosures are missing.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 69
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.8%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 94.4%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 81.2%; rating input score 81; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 44.96; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 24.5% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.8% of revenue deployed · 94.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $110K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $139K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 24 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2015 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 6 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.