Shaw Outreach Team

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
383710853
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2018
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Vail, CO, USA
Phone
9707772821
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Reported finances

Revenue
$98,043
Expenses
$4,907
Assets
$226,818
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JACK ECK (DIRECTOR)
  • SUE FRANCIOSE (DIRECTOR)
  • SUZY DONOHUE (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The shaw outreach team is a volunteer organization that supports the patients and programs of the shaw regional cancer center and jack's place, a cancer caring house adjacent to the shaw regional cancer center, located in edwards, Colorado. The shaw outreach team raises funds to support the continuing operations and capital requirements of the shaw regional cancer center.

What it reported doing in 2018

In fiscal year 2019, sot contributed $2,500 towards gloves for the 2019 pink vail fundraising event via the vail health services foundation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 91
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.5%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 50.9%; rating input score 51

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 95%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 46.22; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.6% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.5% of revenue deployed · 50.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2011 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.