Shasta Wonderland Elite Athletic Team
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 943178856
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Redding, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5305156157
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,871
- Expenses
- $41,697
- Assets
- $196,873
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTINE LIWANPO (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- CHRISTINE LIWANPO (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES WANG (SECRETARY)
- TORI PARKS (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Shasta Wonderland Elite Athletic team was founded in ~ 1975 by several local runners who wanted to raise money to then give to local High School seniors who had run Cross country and distance track in High School. The received the 501C3 and the first event was the John Frank Norcal 10 miler. Over the years the club began hosting The Whiskeytown Relays and then The Reding Marathon. Since Covid, the Relays were cancelled indefinitely due to logistics. We are now the proud host of the Turkey Trot and through these 3 races, we are able to award over 10,000 a year to local graduate. We are proud to have climber out of the Covid slump and our community has rallied behind us to help SWEAT suceed
What it reported doing in 2025
2025 we awarded 15500 to local graduates. we also donated 11000 to the following agencies ( Redding trail alliance, Shasta County amateur radio club, Police and sheriff explorer's clubs, Uprep xctry, and the Redding Sr Citizens Hall, the City of Redding Recreation youth summer program, , and the CCC ( Cal Conservation Corp) All of these agencies and groups played a vital part in SWEAT's event success by providing safety and support at our 3 events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 81
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 50.3%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.72; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -120% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2022 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.