Shasta Lake Chamber of Commerce
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680336903
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Shasta Lake, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5302757497
- Rating
- 45
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,916
- Expenses
- $25,294
- Assets
- $19,247
- Liabilities
- $174
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Alicia Pizano (President)
- Cherrel Kirkland (Vice-President)
People named in this filing
- Alicia Pizano (President)
- Cherrel Kirkland (Vice-President)
- Jantina Ingraham (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Shasta Lake Chamber of Commerce is a volunteer-driven organization dedicated to community support, promoting economic growth, and empowering local entrepreneurs. We believe that when small businesses thrive, our entire community grows stronger. Our Mission: To connect, promote, and advocate for Shasta Lake's business community - fostering economic vitality and a strong sense of belonging.
What it reported doing in 2025
Participated in the Shasta Damboree Community Awards Banquet sponsoring & presenting Business of the Year - benefited 100 attendees; Participated in numerous community functions; Hosted Chamber Adopt a Child Christmas gift giving to benefit local pre-school program - benefited 25 children. Hosted Christmas Light contest - 3 participants from community residents benefited monetarily, hundreds enjoyed the tour of lights. $2896
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 65% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 57
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 6.9%; rating input score 7
- Program expense ratio: 11.4%; rating input score 11
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 39.7%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.76; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 83% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 37.3% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 138.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 6.9% of revenue deployed · 11.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 7/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 11/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.