Shasta Kennel Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237311307
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2017
- Location
- Redding, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5305296590
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $102,740
- Expenses
- $85,307
- Assets
- $124,910
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TYLER CRADY-ROCHE (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TYLER CRADY-ROCHE (PRESIDENT)
- PAM CHANDLER (VP/SECRETARY)
- THERESE FORMAN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To conduct shows and trials. In conducting these events we strive to teach people how to properly treat and train their animals.
What it reported doing in 2022
Held dogs shows and obedience trials. The training provided at each of our shows and trials provide the people with invaluable tools and resources to better train and raise their animals. The tactics taught at our show ensure the humane treatment of the animals and further the knowledge of our population base that are pet owners.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The available information about grant readiness automatic revocation leaves an important question unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 90.2%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.46; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 90.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $77K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2010 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.