Arizona Health and Physical Education
Legal name: Shape Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 812767746
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2017
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Mesa, Arizona, US
- Phone
- 4809694957
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,668
- Expenses
- $92,334
- Assets
- $29,974
- Liabilities
- $3,748
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KERI SCHOEFF (PRESIDENT / CEO UNTIL 10-2017)
- LYNN PREBLE (PRESIDENT / CEO SINCE 10-2017)
- MATT MIXER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- HEATHER CHEWNING (PRESIDENT ELECT SINCE 10-2017)
People named in this filing
- KERI SCHOEFF (PRESIDENT / CEO UNTIL 10-2017)
- PAM LONG (TREASURER / CFO UNTIL 3-2018)
- PRISCILLA IOSCA (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Arizona Health & Physical Education provides leadership through continuing professional development and advocacy that ensures effective delivery of evidence-informed school physical education and community based physical activity programs that foster healthy, active, and physically literate youth.
What it reported doing in 2017
State and local program events include:1. The state convention is held annually over 2.5 days and features classes, keynote speakers and exhibits, all geared to school and community based physical education educators. 2. A one-day conference provides valuable education and training to those working with students with special needs. It is held at a facility that is specially designed for those with physical or other limitation.3. A variety of workshops intended to bring new learning opportunities to members and the community at large.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 17
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 94.5%; rating input score 95
- Program expense ratio: 70.3%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -34.5%; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 94.5% of revenue deployed · 70.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $65K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.