Shannon Elliott Movement

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920619142
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Grand Blanc, MI, USA
Phone
7703740313
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug and Substance Abuse, Dependency Prevention and Treatment

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$1,500
Assets
$1,500
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jim Sakalis (President/Ceo)

People named in this filing

  • Jim Sakalis (President/Ceo)
  • Diann Elliott (Treasurer)
  • Julie Garza-Sakalis (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help raise money to provide affordable housing for families recovering from drug addiction

What it reported doing in 2023

Website Development and Management: Successfully launched a dynamic and user-friendly website that serves as the central hub for our organization's activities, mission, and resources. Regularly updated the website with relevant content, including news, events, volunteer opportunities, and success stories to engage visitors and stakeholders. Implemented features such as donation portals, volunteer sign-up forms, and educational resources to enhance user experience and encourage participation. Networking with Local Communities: Actively engaged with local communities through outreach initiatives, including attending community events, meetings, and workshops to raise awareness about our organization's mission and services. Established partnerships and collaborations with community organizations, schools, businesses, and government agencies to amplify our impact and reach a wider audience. Conducted targeted outreach campaigns to specific demographic groups or neighborhoods to ensure inclusivity and accessibility of our programs and services. Awareness Campaigns: Designed and implemented creative and effective awareness campaigns to promote our non-profit's mission and objectives through various channels, including social media, email newsletters, print materials, and public service announcements. Leveraged storytelling, testimonials, and visual content to convey the importance of our cause and inspire action within the community. Utilized data analytics and feedback mechanisms to measure the reach and impact of our awareness campaigns and refine our strategies for maximum effectiveness. Community Engagement and Feedback: Facilitated open dialogue and engagement with community members through forums, surveys, focus groups, and feedback sessions to understand their needs, preferences, and concerns. Incorporated community feedback into program planning, implementation, and evaluation processes to ensure relevance, responsiveness, and accountability. Empowered community members to become advocates and ambassadors for our organization's mission by providing them with resources, training, and opportunities for leadership and involvement. Impact Measurement and Reporting: Implemented robust monitoring and evaluation systems to track the outcomes, outputs, and impacts of our program services and activities. Generated regular reports and impact assessments to communicate our achievements, challenges, and lessons learned to stakeholders, including donors, partners, funders, and the broader community. Used storytelling, testimonials, and data visualization techniques to effectively communicate our impact and inspire continued support and engagement. Overall, through our website development, networking efforts, awareness campaigns, and community engagement strategies, we have successfully advanced our non-profit organization's mission, expanded our reach, and strengthened our connections with local communities to create positive social change.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.