Shamrock Way Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
475470884
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2023
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Carlsbad, CA, USA
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Youth Development Programs

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,585
Expenses
$102,933
Assets
$187,871
Liabilities
$91

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • FRANK SHAMROCK (President)
  • MAURO RANALLO (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • FRANK SHAMROCK (President)
  • MAURO RANALLO (Vice President)
  • FRANK SHAMROCK (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Helping communities find peace and personal fulfillment. We believe that every person has a special gift and energy to share with this universe. We believe, to thrive as humans beings, we must practice continuous personal, physical and spiritual development in all things within our communities. We believe that every person needs a family community to achieve our dream.

What it reported doing in 2023

Shamrock Way produced BiPolarRocknRoller documentary with Showtime Networks to raise awareness of bipolar disorder.We raised funds and awareness for several non profit entities to build our network of support. With Hope Sports we built homes in Mexico for families in poverty, Mission Volant we jumped out of airplanes and created awareness media for veterans families who have committed suicide.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 32
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -236.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.83; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 27.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 33.9% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2015 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.