Shakopee Soccer Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411972181
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Shakopee, MN, USA
- Phone
- 9529537246
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $959,537
- Expenses
- $1,108,331
- Assets
- $570,702
- Liabilities
- $414,524
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MICHAEL SHADDUCK (PRESIDENT)
- WADE ANDREWS (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WADE ANDREWS (VICE PRESIDENT): $3,649 total reported compensation
- RAY ANDERSON (SECRETARY): $3,550 total reported compensation
- KEVIN BREUER (COMPETITIVE DIRECTOR): $3,210 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster the development of youth aged nineteen (19) years of age or younger and support the efforts of isd 720 shakopee school district and its coaches to teach proper, safe techniques and ethical practices of soccer under Minnesota youth soccer association ("mysa") rules; to encourage effective communication, cooperation, sportsmanship, and healthy competition; to develop the value and self-esteem of each individual participant; and to create an atmosphere where camaraderie, inclusiveness, accountability, learning and respect are valued. To promote a sense of community and combat juvenile delinquency by creating and maintaining an organized soccer program for youth that encourages opportunities for all to learn, play, and grow both on and off the field.
What it reported doing in 2024
Fostered the development of youth to teach proper, safe techniques and ethical practices of soccer under Minnesota youth soccer association ("mysa") rules. Encourageed effective communication, cooperation, sportsmanship, and healthy competition. Developed the self-esteem of each individual participant and created an atmosphere where camaraderie, inclusiveness, accountability, learning and respect are valued. Promoted a sense of community and combated juvenile delinquency by creating and maintaining an organized soccer program for youth that encourages opportunities for all to learn, play, and grow both on and off the field.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 94% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 86
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 90.3%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.5%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.73; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.9%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 90.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $4K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 59/100.