Shady Side Academy
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 250965561
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Phone
- 4129683137
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Elementary, Secondary Education, K - 12
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,787,975
- Expenses
- $52,905,377
- Assets
- $167,410,614
- Liabilities
- $20,459,600
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
37 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BARTLEY P GRIFFITH JR (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- BARTLEY P GRIFFITH JR (PRESIDENT): $896,590 total reported compensation
- ROSALYND SABUNDAYO (SENIOR SCHOOL - HEAD OF SCHOOL): $304,867 total reported compensation
- MICHELLE MERSON (HEAD OF SCHOOL): $269,151 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Shady side academy offers an exceptional pre-k through twelfth grade academic and balanced educational experience by challenging each student to realize his or her potential in a stimulating and nurturing environment.
What it reported doing in 2024
Instructional: founded in 1883, shady side academy's primary program service is the education of students in pre-kindergarten through grade 12 in a coed school environment, with an optional boarding experience in high school. We offer pittsburgh-area families four campuses, including the choice between two elementary schools (pk-5): the country day school in fox chapel, nestled in the north suburbs, and the junior school in point breeze, located in the heart of the city's east end. Our middle school (6-8) and senior school (9-12) campuses are both located in suburban fox chapel and draw students from across the region. In january 2026, the academy consolidated from four campuses to three.the academy enrolled approximately 1,265 students across all four campuses during the 2024/2025 academic year. The academy's mission is to challenge students to think expansively, act ethically and lead responsibly. Inspired by this mission, shady side's driving purpose remains the development of responsible, transformative leaders for the city of pittsburgh and beyond. This reason for existing was embedded at our inception. We deliver on our mission by creating a unique and valuable education for families and bright, curious students who want small classes and big opportunities, desire a balanced and informed worldview, and who seek real-world learning and to become the leaders of a connected, digital future.shady side is intimate enough to know, support and care for individual learners, but also large enough to offer a program where all students can find their place to connect, lead, and succeed, often on the biggest stage and under the brightest lights. Shady side pairs western Pennsylvania's most geographically diverse student body (125 zip codes, 14 states and four countries) with a broad and balanced curriculum, challenging students who see the world in remarkably different ways to engage in a dialogue that is essential to expansive thought and responsible leadership. We empower our students to engage confidently in civil discourse and foster productive relationships that promote unity and bridge divides both locally and globally.as pittsburgh continues to evolve as a hub for technology, research, and design, ssa has made strategic investments in these areas and now has the distinctive opportunity to develop leaders at the expanding nexus of technology and the liberal arts. The academy has the capacity to provide our students with real-world learning experiences that will prepare them to become ethical, humane leaders in a rapidly changing world. To further enhance these three unique points of value, shady side continues to make appropriate investments in the people, program, and places that bring our mission and strategy to life for students. At shady side, we make room for students to make their move. We believe learning should be expansive and exciting for students, so they can be the architects of their own adventure. We empower teachers who love teaching, so students can feel joy in every classroom. We go beyond standard education, so graduates will be ready for college and everything after. We move with the world, so our students can too. Athletics: all shady side academy students are offered a wide range of physical activities throughout the school year to encourage healthy choices, develop skills and learn the importance of sportsmanshipshady side is intimate enough to know, support and care for individual learners, but also large enough to offer a program where all students can find their place to connect, lead, and succeed, often on the biggest stage and under the brightest lights.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 85% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 76
- Accountability: 91
- Sustainability: 63
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 67.4%; rating input score 67
- Program expense ratio: 71.8%; rating input score 72
- Fundraising efficiency: $8.21 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
- Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
- Requires narrative reports: Fail
- Conducts field audits: Fail
- May suspend future funding: Fail
- Requires financial reports: Fail
- Conducts site visits: Fail
- Requires grant agreements: Fail
- May require repayment: Fail
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 84%; rating input score 84; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.8%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 67.4% of revenue deployed · 71.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 25 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $38M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $897K · 37 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $16M reported
- Consistency: 42 of 43 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 11 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 12 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.