Shadow Warrior Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261365197
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Ft Bragg, NC, USA
- Rating
- 50
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $84,600
- Expenses
- $53,266
- Assets
- $173,272
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JAY SANTIAGO JR (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAY SANTIAGO JR (PRESIDENT)
- JAMES SIMSON (TREASURER)
- JOHN MCLAUGHLIN (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is a veterans organization whose purpose is: to further develop the common bonds existing between all who honorably serve with the 112th signal battalion; to preserve and publish the history of the unit; to render acts of charity and service in the form of educational scholarships, nco and soldier of the year awards, the annual shadow ball, and historical markers and ceremonies.
What it reported doing in 2019
The association contributed to the morale and welfare of the men and women of the 112th signal battalion by sponsoring a military ball, golf tournament and exposition for the battalion members and their families.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 95% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 21
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 33%; rating input score 33
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.25; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.6% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 33% of revenue deployed
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2019
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 33/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.