Shaare Daas Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
883476322
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$147,603
Expenses
$147,420
Assets
$525
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHANANEL GREENWALD (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • CHANANEL GREENWALD (PRESIDENT)
  • BORUCH MORDECHAI PORTAL (TREASURER)
  • ELAINE RUBIN (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

1. To support institutions and individuals that teach or promote torah, specifically in the areas of jewish law in an understandable and relevant manner to everyday life with the ultimate goal of creating a better life and a better world and also creating leaders to inspire and educate communities throughout the world. 2. To support and encourage the scholarly study and research of torah. 3. To offer charitable support (spiritual and physical) to all those in need especially those affected by extreme poverty and those unemployed looking to gain the necessary skills to find appropriate work, including offering limited interest free loans. By assisting others in bringing humanitarian relief, they will have the opportunity to be free to learn and appreciate the wisdom of the torah

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.7%; rating input score 86
  • Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.1%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 63.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 52.6% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 42.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 85.7% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $126K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.