Sga of Florida Inc School Guardians Association of Fl

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464611869
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2021
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2021, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Palm Beach Gardens, FL, USA
Phone
5616443584
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,668
Expenses
$1,484
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER WOLF (PRESIDENT/TR)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTOPHER WOLF (PRESIDENT/TR)
  • JON NEWCOMB (VICE PRESIDE)
  • SCOTT BARNWELL (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2021. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Partners with school guardians throughout the state by providing enhanced training, targeted education, and a sense of community to foster interaction and fellowsip.

What it reported doing in 2021

Our mission is training needs to be conducted on a routine basis otherwise an individuals ability to perform under stress is diminished exponentially. Guardians must completely understand both the criminal and civil legal requirements that affect their profession. Sga recognizes school guardians fall into that class of warrior and, as such, deserve the education and resources to survive on that battle front. Sgas background in law enforcement and partnerships forged within the firearms industry allow for training in a wide variety of firearms. Belonging to a group of like minded people where guardians can share similar interests and experiences is vital to their successful program. One way society responds to a tragedy is to put in place measures which recognize, prevent, and intervene prior to the emergence of the next threat. The Florida state legislature created the civilian school guardian position as a means to protect our schools and children.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 52
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 18.4%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 94.9%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 80.6%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -84.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -147.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 18.4% of revenue deployed · 94.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2019 to 2021
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.