Sfmms Community Service Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943230890
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4155610850
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,066
Expenses
$21,515
Assets
$93,538
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON NAU (PRESIDENT)
  • SARITA SATPATHY (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • DENNIS SONG (IMMEDIATE PAST-PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JASON NAU (PRESIDENT)
  • SARITA SATPATHY (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • DENNIS SONG (IMMEDIATE PAST-PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educational & scientific health care studies.

What it reported doing in 2024

The sfmms community service foundation (csf) serves as the philanthropic arm of the san francisco marin medical society. Csf addresses pressing public health issues by providing leadership in crucial and emerging health issues, strengthening the ability of physicians to work with diverse communities, and enabling physicians to provide the best care possible to their patients through various outlets, includingtraining opportunities and access to cutting edge materials and resources. The csf is maintained as a vehicle for potential future grant-funded activities in line with its stated mission and for disbursement of grants to local community benefit organizations whose activities align with the values, beliefs, and priorities of the society's physician membership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -324.7%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.35; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.