Sfa Construction Management Industry Advisory Board Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993560635
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Nacogdoches, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7135016429
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $26,500
- Expenses
- $4,279
- Assets
- $22,221
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JULIE LLOYD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JORDAN ELDER (TREASURER)
- JULIE LLOYD (PRESIDENT)
- CHRIS OLIVEIRA (VICE-PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sfa construction management industry advisory board fondation is a Texas non-profit corporation ("corporation") organized under the Texas business organizations code for exclusively charitable, educational, scientific and other nonprofitable purposes, substantially all of the activities of which are for such purposes and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, section 11.18 of the Texas tax code, and any other future amendments or successors to such codes. In particular, the corporation seeks to support the stephen f. Austin state university construction management industry advisory board by raising funds to be used for scholarships, grants, and support of the academic program and its instructors.
What it reported doing in 2024
Management and raising of funds and events to support the stephen f. Austin state university construction management industry advisory board through the use of scholarships, grants, and support of the academic program and its instructors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 82% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 24
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 77
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 8.3%; rating input score 8
- Program expense ratio: 51.3%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 83.9%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.19; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 8.3% of revenue deployed · 51.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.