Seven Hills Homeless Center Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 731603960
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Fayetteville, AR, USA
- Phone
- 4799664378
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Homeless Centers
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,379,391
- Expenses
- $1,507,334
- Assets
- $2,106,663
- Liabilities
- $176,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILL ROTH (PAST PRESIDENT)
- READ HUDSON (PRESIDENT)
- BRENT ROBINSON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- BECCI SISSON (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- BECCI SISSON (CEO): $30,631 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seven hills begins our relationship with our clients by meeting them "where they are" with a spirit of compassion. We have high expectations of our clients, thus providing dignity through accountability. Our programs teach our clients skills and provide them the opportuniites necessary for sustainability as productive members of our community. All three of seven hills programs meet important service gaps in our community. We rely on community partnerships to meet the wide variety of needs that our clients bring to us. To eliminate the duplication of services our programs are operated using best-practice standards developed by the national alliance to end homelessness. We intereact with all of our stakeholders in a spirit of transparency, promoting feedback and continual improvements to our program.
What it reported doing in 2024
Providing day shelter for homeless individuals and services such as: meals, showers, clothing, transportation, medical care and agency referrals. Transitional supportive housing for up to to twelve months is also provided for some of our clients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 85
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.2%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 79.8%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $101.24 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.4; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.8% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.2% of revenue deployed · 79.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $31K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.