Setebaid Services
Legal name: Setebaid Services Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 232979076
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Winfield, PA, USA
- Phone
- (570) 524-9090
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Patient Services - Entertainment, Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $724,199
- Expenses
- $610,598
- Assets
- $826,157
- Liabilities
- $116,593
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Moyer (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Mark Moyer (President): $86,935 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Setebaid Services provides diabetes education, support, and camp experiences for youth living with diabetes and their families, trains future healthcare professionals to effectively manage and treat people with diabetes, and encourages diabetes research.
What it reported doing in 2025
The Harrisburg Diabetic Youth Camp (HDYC) was held in Mifflinburg, PA from July 13- 19, 2025 for ages 7-13. It met its mission by training campers excellent diabetesmanagement skills and reducing diabetes-related stress often leading to depression in youth living with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D). The campers enjoyed meetingothers with T1D, which ended their social isolation, while enjoying normal camp activities like arts and crafts, sports, archery, boating, gaga ball, kick ball, volleyball, basketball, soccer, and an outdoor dance. In addition, The HDYC met its mission by training over 10 future healthcare professionals how to work with patients livingwith T1D.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 79% for direct work, and 21% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
- Program expense ratio: 97%; rating input score 97
- Fundraising efficiency: $96.54 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 15.7%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.2%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 97% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $592K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $87K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 31 of 32 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Document-retention policy not reported.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.