Service Dogs Nh
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831768918
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Dover, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6039887995
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $68,240
- Expenses
- $4,618
- Assets
- $79,596
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- Brendan Madden (Chairman)
- Jared Burks (Treasurer)
- Michael Roscoe (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The New Hampshire Coalition for the Support of Service Dogs is an IRS recognized charitable 501(c) (3) organization. The charity may assist with things such as veterinarian bills, surgery, medicines, and purchasing food to qualified individuals. In addition, the charity will attempt to answer any questions or concerns about service dogs to individuals owning service dogs or the public in general.
What it reported doing in 2024
Proposed legislation for service dogs, which was passed by the NH Senate but was killed in the House. Testified before two Senate and two House Committees on proposed legislation relating to service dogs. At the request of the Deputy Commissioner of the NH Dept. of Labor I attended five job fairs to discuss service dogs in the work place and the ADA requirements. Attended numerous chamber and other organization events to discuss and educate attendees on service dogs. Unfortunately, for the first time there was no one who applied for financial assistance. Commenced work on a mailing to all Veterinarians in the state to ensure they know of our services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 70% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 4
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 89
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.7%; rating input score 1
- Program expense ratio: 9.3%; rating input score 9
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 93.2%; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 17.24; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0.7% of revenue deployed · 9.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $430 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 1/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.