Servants at Work Inc Virginia
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833751081
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Fredericksburg, VA, USA
- Phone
- 5406460896
- Rating
- 75
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Home Improvement and Repairs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $160,905
- Expenses
- $102,591
- Assets
- $95,735
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
People named in this filing
- STEVE ECKEL (CHAIR)
- CHARLIE RUSSELL (TREASURER)
- CHRISHON DUCKER (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Servants at work, inc. - saws Virginia is an all volunteer 501(c)3 non profit that works to restore freedom, independence and dignity of impoverished disabled persons allowing them to more easily access medical services, improve the safety of their home, reconnect with their community and age-in-place regardless of race, ethnicity, gender identity, sexual orientation, religion or creed.
What it reported doing in 2025
Servants at work - saws Virginia transforms the lives of those trapped inside their home and provides a transformational experience for those who serve them. Since our launch in march 2019, saws Virginia has installed more than 203 ramps for persons with long-term ambulatory disabilities who have few if any options to restore safe access to their home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 54
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.6%; rating input score 45
- Program expense ratio: 69.9%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 36.2%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.93; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.3%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 22.5% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.6% of revenue deployed · 69.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 45/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.