Sequel Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 854297434
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Rapid City, SD, USA
- Phone
- 6057214383
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $71,064
- Expenses
- $141,658
- Assets
- $1,066,809
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RENEE SALES (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MAGGIE DRAKE (EXECUTIVE DI): $80,841 total reported compensation
- KERRY LASSAUX (ED (THRU 03/): $11,871 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Empowering elders in their next chapter of life through supportive services.
What it reported doing in 2024
The organizations vision is to establish sequel as the premier resource for elderly people in our region. In order to continue to implement this vision, we: continued to research and apply for qualifying grants. Used social media to increase public awareness and develop strategic partnerships. Joined nexus sd to expand our reach to people in need through additional online and 211 (telephone) support services. We continue the following programs caregiver support - we continue to participate in current caregiver support networks and research opportunities for expansion within those networks. We are currently a sponsor for memory cafe, a caregiver support network. We help them with their rent, and purchase event supplies and refreshments for the attendees to enjoy. Elder angel fund - we used our application process for at risk seniors to access a specified grant amount for a specific need. We were able to help 6 seniors in the last quarter of 2024. We believe that seniors should not have to choose between food and medication or food and dressing supplies. Sadly, that is a scenario that plays out all too frequently in our community. We set up a fund so community members can help bridge the financial gap for vulnerable seniors. Our applications have increased already in 2024. Angel tree - we partnered with black hills advocate and meals on wheels on the collection and distribution of the angel tree christmas gifts. Over 6,000 items were received from donors enabling us to deliver over 625 gifts to some of the isolated seniors in our community. Guardianship/conservatorship - sequel provides court-appointed guardianship and conservatorship services for vulnerable adults who are unable to make decisions on their own due to age, illness, or incapacity. As one of only two nonprofits in the state offering these services, sequel ensures that individuals receive proper advocacy, financial oversight, and compassionate support in managing their personal and financial affairs. This work protects clients' rights, promotes their well-being, and helps secure appropriate housing, medical care, and benefits.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 67
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 35
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 31%; rating input score 31
- Fundraising efficiency: $0.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -99.3%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.53; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 65.4%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 52% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -92.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 31% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $81K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.