Sentencing Foundation Resource-Based Sentencing & Superv
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 884018285
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Fund Raising and Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $7,789
- Expenses
- $3,739
- Assets
- $4,050
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Albert Harrison Jr (Executive Director)
People named in this filing
- Stephanie M Sawyer (Board Chair)
- Albert Harrison Jr (Executive Director)
- Shanda Lucas-ODennis (Treasurer Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Reducing Mass Incarceration
What it reported doing in 2024
The Sentencing Foundation TSF provides logistical and administrative support for the Resource Based Sentencing and Supervision RBSS initiativea comprehensive proactive system of accountability designed to reduce recidivism by connecting defendants in the criminal justice system with education employment housing and behavioral health resources.RBSS requires sentencing judges to identify the underlying causes of an offense order conditions that directly address those causes and establish measurable expectations for compliance with the defendant to fulfill those conditions. Judges then hold periodic status hearings to assess progress and ensure both the defendant and resource providers remain accountable. This approach aims to reduce recidivism improve public safety outcomes and promote long-term community stability through coordinated resource-based interventions.TSFs primary role is to facilitate the integration of the RBSS model into court operations by connecting sentencing judges to verified cost-free reentry and support services. The organization provides logistical coordination data management and technical assistance to judicial partners implementing RBSS principles. Currently six anchor judges across three states have received training and or implemented the RBSS framework in their courtrooms.During this year TSF expanded its core team to include leads for Reentry Resource Network Creation & Maintenance RNCM Data Support Judicial Outreach and administrative and IT functions. These team members have contributed to vetting service providers training interns managing judicial engagement and maintaining digital infrastructure. Recruitment is underway for a dedicated judicial trainer; in the interim the Board President provides pre-training and coaching to judicial partners.TSF actively gathers feedback through RBSS network meetings exit interviews with defendants and weekly internal reviews. These activities have enhanced data collection methods improved operational efficiency and strengthened organizational infrastructure.Although comprehensive outcome data are still being collected early evidence and testimonials indicate that RBSS offers a more effective humane alternative to traditional sentencing models that emphasize punishment over rehabilitation. Participants frequently report that RBSS helps them make meaningful life changes with several graduates now assisting TSF in outreach and resource development. One illustrative example occurred when a defendant sentenced under RBSS was confronted by police over an unrelated matter. When the individual began to resist the presiding judge calmly intervened addressing the person by name and asking if they trusted her. Upon affirming that trust the individual complied peacefully. This moment exemplifies how RBSS fosters mutual respect and builds trust between the judiciary and defendants an essential step toward rebuilding faith in the justice system. Through these efforts TSF continues to advance evidence-based sentencing reform and promote safer more equitable communities by addressing the root causes of criminal behavior rather than merely its symptoms.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 52%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.08; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: 150% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.