Seniors Pet Assistance Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 205464573
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9729406854
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,059
- Expenses
- $118,368
- Assets
- $99,202
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jacqueline West (Executive Director)
- Laurie Jennings (President)
People named in this filing
- Jacqueline West (Executive Director)
- Laurie Jennings (President)
- Marge Austin (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seniors' Pet Assistance Network (SPAN) is a Dallas County TX based organization that helps low income senior citizens with care of companion animals (pets).
What it reported doing in 2025
Seniors' Pet Assistance Network (SPAN) is a Dallas County based organization that helps low income senior citizens with care of companion animals (pets). SPAN secures basic quality consistent food for clients pets. providing pet food is the second largest component of mission. SPAN is privately funded 501(C3) not-for-profit corporation. SPAN's vision is that all Dallas County seniors should be able to provide adequate care for companion animals. - this is for food component of services
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 76.1%; rating input score 76
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.84; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 28.4%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 76.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $90K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.