Senior Services of Central Illinois
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 370895193
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Springfield, IL, USA
- Phone
- 2175284035
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,355,089
- Expenses
- $5,401,082
- Assets
- $5,099,819
- Liabilities
- $445,885
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
19 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRANDON CLARK (PRESIDENT)
- ANN JIRMASKEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CAROL HARMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROL HARMS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $103,015 total reported compensation
- TRACY TRELLO (FISCAL DIRECTOR): $95,985 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support and serve seniors with non-medical services and to promote independent living and enrich quality of life.
What it reported doing in 2024
Care coordination unit - the care coordination unit (ccu) is a department of many programs and many initiatives and pilot programs. All programs are designed to assist individuals age 60 plus remain independent and in their own homes as long as it is safely possible. Programs operated under the ccu umbrella are: comprehensive care management state certified care coordinators visit individuals age 60 + in their own homes, hospitals, nursing homes, assistive and supportive living facilities to educate them and their families about the choices for care that are available in the community. They complete a needs assessment and determine eligibility for home and community based services. Once eligibility is determined the care coordinator and the individual develop a person centered plan of care that will meet the individual's needs from the options available. The care coordinator makes referrals for appropriate programs and then monitors the individual to make sure their needs are being met. Not only do care coordinators prevent premature nursing home placement they also assist eligible individuals to return to the community from a long term care facility.choices for care completes hospital and long term care (ltc) facility screenings providing consultations for 18-60+ individuals that need to know options for placement for rehab and services when they return home. Another service offered is the ccu's money management program. This program assists eligible individuals with their finances. Insured and trained volunteers provide a variety of services such as making sure monthly bills are paid on time, writing checks, balancing checkbooks, budgeting and managing monthly government benefits.the adult services program (aps) - state certified case workers respond to allegations of abuse, neglect and self-neglect and exploitation of victims age 60 + and individuals age 18 to 59 that have a disability. Case workers determine if the allegations are founded and with the victim's consent develop a safety plan that includes referrals to legal services, law enforcement, orders of protection and other available interventions.our information and assistance program covers many services such as benefit access (aging and disabled) assistance for caregivers, options counseling for individuals and their families, assist with application to available programs, assistance with medicare issues including enrollment and appeals, as well as providing outreach in the community making sure people understand the options available to them.all ccu programs work together providing comprehensive options to all individuals who request them.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.5%; rating input score 90
- Program expense ratio: 88.6%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.9%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.94; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.2% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.1% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89.5% of revenue deployed · 88.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 5 filed program accomplishments · $4.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $103K · 19 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $243K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 30/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.