Senior Mens Club Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
850640124
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Birmingham, MI, USA
Rating
48
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Reported finances

Revenue
$190,477
Expenses
$133,186
Assets
$172,044

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jay Kafarski (Vice President)
  • James Fleck (President)

People named in this filing

  • Charles Dick Bradley (Development Chair)
  • Jay Kafarski (Vice President)
  • Gary Melikian (Advisor)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Senior Mens Club Foundation Foundation is dedicated to the support of initiatives enhancing the well-being of senior men within the Greater Detroit Metropolitan area of the State of Michigan. The Foundation is organized and operated exclusively for charitable and educational purposes serving senior men and their spouses significant others in accordance with Section 501c3 of the U. S. Internal Revenue Code.

What it reported doing in 2025

Micah 6 - Grant was given to Micah 6 in 2025 a community service organization operating in an under-served community in Pontiac Michigan. Micah 6 provides food to under-priveleged people. In addition they create opportunities for enrichment learning connection and fun for neighborhood kids. Each year they grow thousands of pounds of produce that go directly back into the community at no cost to the recipients.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 96% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 4
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 66
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 3.2%; rating input score 3
  • Program expense ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 5

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 30.1%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.29; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 58.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 3.2% of revenue deployed · 4.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 5/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.