Senate Hispanic Research Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742724063
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2013, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5124998606
Rating
45
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$112,480
Expenses
$41,971
Assets
$83,142
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SARAH SAENZ (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • CHRISTINE YANAS (BOARD MEMBER)
  • GERARD TORRES (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JAIME CAPELO (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide educational and leadership opportunities to promising undergraduate and graduate students by supporting a legislative internship program. The shrc remains dedicated to encouraging the educational achievement of our youth, thereby ensuring a stronger and better-prepared future for our state.

What it reported doing in 2024

The senate hispanic research council (shrc) takes great pride in honoring the legacy of senator gregory luna through a paid internship program that provides talented students with meaningful opportunities to gain hands-on legislative experience, deepen their understanding of public policy, and strengthen their leadership and professional skills. This educational initiative has transformed lives by cultivating a pipeline of well-prepared, civically engaged leaders for Texas.to date, the shrc has supported over 145 students in learning the legislative process while developing the skills necessary to become future leaders. Looking ahead, we remain committed to expanding this program and enhancing our efforts to nurture the next generation of Texas leadership.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 78
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 62.7%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.98; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.