Senate Employees' Child Care Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521331367
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2022245288
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Child Day Care

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,026,315
Expenses
$2,136,712
Assets
$809,275
Liabilities
$166,215

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ARUN REVANA (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRIDGETTE WATERS (ASSISTANT DI): $113,052 total reported compensation
  • CHRISTINA HARRIS-JONES (DIRECTOR): $105,060 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The senate employees' child care center is designed to provide a comprehensive and highly individualized program that fosters the physical, social, emotional, and intellectual growth of every child enrolled in the program.

What it reported doing in 2024

The senate employees child care center is designed to provide a comprehensive and highly individualized program that fosters the physical, social, emotional, and intellectual growth of every child enrolled in the program. Children are offered age-appropriate learning opportunities as described in the centers curriculum. Parents are expected to participate in the ongoing activities of the center and to collaborate with the staff in the operation of the center. The senate employees child care center is a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization governed by a board of directors. Members of the board of directors are elected by the membership of the corporation to serve staggering two-year terms. Generally, members of the board are also parents of children enrolled in the program. Because the center is a non-profit and parent-governed organization, it is naturally oriented to the best interests of the community of children it serves. The goal of the center is to assure childrens daily exposure to a safe, nurturing, enriching, and age-appropriate environment. To assure these goals are met, the center uses as guidelines the standards provided by its accrediting body, the national academy of early childhood program, a division of the national association for the education of young children (naeyc). The center originally became accredited in 1989 and was the first center in Washington, dc, to receive accreditation. The center has been continuously accredited since that time. Our program philosophy, curriculum, staff, structure, and governance are critical components in the quality of the program. However, that is not our only resource. We turn to each other - professionals with varying levels of experience and varied talents, and to the parents with their extensive array of experiences - to continually evaluate and enrich our program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 92
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 84
  • Sustainability: 21
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 94%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 89.1%; rating input score 89
  • Fundraising efficiency: $206.66 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -5.4%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.38; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.2%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 94% of revenue deployed · 89.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $113K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 43/100.