Semilla Socio-environmental Fund
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 993091648
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2024386959
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Safety Education
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $188,977
- Expenses
- $25,915
- Assets
- $177,827
- Liabilities
- $11,668
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- EDUARDO FERNANDO FRANCO BERTON (P)
- Andrea Segovia Narvaez (DIRECTOR)
- Carlos Andres Segovia Narvaez (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organizations primary exempt purpose is to support and strengthen community-based organizations working toward socio-environmental justice, environmental protection, and sustainable development in underserved communities. The organization provides financial support, capacity-building, and technical assistance to local initiatives that protect ecosystems, empower vulnerable populations, and promote social and environmental sustainability.
What it reported doing in 2025
The organization provided financial and technical support to community-based organizations and local socio-environmental initiatives in Bolivia. In 2025, the Fund awarded 1 grant for environmental conservation projects benefiting approximately 10 persons. Activities included grantmaking, capacity building, community engagement, and support for projects focused on environmental protection and sustainable development in the Global South. Program expenses totaled $10,273.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 86.3%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.86; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.