Selous Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521433476
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025476963
- Rating
- 52
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International, Foreign Affairs, and National Security N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $257,865
- Expenses
- $90,800
- Assets
- $7,391
- Liabilities
- $57,913
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MORGAN NORVAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- MORGAN NORVAL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $9,788 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Foster, develop and promote, on a non-partisan basis, a greater understanding and awareness of the conflicts for power and control within and among cultural and societal groups, political entities, governments throughout the world.
What it reported doing in 2018
Dissemination of information and results of research related to conflicts of power and control within and between cultural, societal, and governmental systems.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 26
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 85
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 14.1%; rating input score 14
- Program expense ratio: 40.1%; rating input score 40
- Fundraising efficiency: $11.05 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: No; rating input score 0
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 75%; rating input score 75; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.8%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 7.84; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 10.8%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -17.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -12.6% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -43.5% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 14.1% of revenue deployed · 40.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 4 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $36K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $10K · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 24 of 24 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2013 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 40/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Major donor itemization scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 44/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.