Selma District Hospital Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942864469
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2014
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2014
Location
Selma, CA, USA
Phone
5598566420
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$104,901
Expenses
$144,940
Assets
$147,872

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Marla Grey (Vice President)
  • Hugh Adams (President)
  • Ernesto Perez (Past President)

People named in this filing

  • Virginia Lees (Director)
  • Scott Bailey (Director)
  • Marla Grey (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2014. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To improve healthcare services in Selma by providing financial support to Hanford Community Hospital DBA Adventist Medical Center-Selma (FKA Selma District Hospital).

What it reported doing in 2014

The foundation operates a thrift shop stocked with donated clothing and household items. Low-income community members are able to purchase low-cost merchandise to cloth their families and furnish their homes. The monies raised through the thrift shop are used to support Adventist Medical Center-Selma.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 98.9%; rating input score 99
  • Program expense ratio: 71.5%; rating input score 72

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -38.2%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -13.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 98.9% of revenue deployed · 71.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2010 to 2014
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.
  • High — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization is not authorized to operate as a charity in California.