Selma Bridge of Hope United
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 921799559
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Kingwood, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8323452534
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,000
- Expenses
- $11,742
- Assets
- $10,000
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARIE JEANNE MOUGNUS DJIMBI (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- MARIE JEANNE MOUGNUS DJIMBI (PRESIDENT)
- WILFRID MBOULA (SECRETARY DI)
- EDEN NERIJA PASCALE AVOMO (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Selma bridge of hope united is nonprofit organization created to help underprivileged people, homeless , young incarcerated, young mothers with children , abandoned persons. Helped them with housing and skills, to benefit them and help live challenges, we want to educate and give them the skills to cope and strength them with new path of freedom. Because education is the key to success and happiness. We are committed to help those around the world who believe in new opportunities to give themselves a second chances, well help those in africa who as been living in precarious conditions with shelters, water and electricity. Education and skills are power no matter who you are or where you come from.
What it reported doing in 2023
We gave 4 months of sewing classes. We worked on the basic knowledge of sewing machines. We also taught them basic skills on stitches. They learned how to make pillows.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 35
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.5%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 46.8%; rating input score 47
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 41.3%; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.5% of revenue deployed · 46.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.