Seeds of Peace Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521814447
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2125738040
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- International Peace and Security
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,830,146
- Expenses
- $3,766,075
- Assets
- $2,212,740
- Liabilities
- $274,857
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
20 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EVA ARMOUR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- EVA ARMOUR (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $191,173 total reported compensation
- VISHNU SWAMINATHAN (CHIEF OPERATING & FINANCIAL OFFICER): $106,029 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Seeds of peace inspires and cultivates new generations of global leaders in communities divided by conflict. We equip them with the skills and relationships they need to accelerate social, economic, and political changes essential for peace.
What it reported doing in 2024
Multinational: in 2022, gather focused on building local hubs in east jerusalem, ramallah, and tel aviv to foster collective action and increase its impact in palestine and israel. In east jerusalem, we partnered with sinsila, a palestinian organization dedicated to educating, inspiring, and empowering local communities. In july, we ran a month-long program that included community dialogue circles, design thinking skill building sessions, and project-based action to better the lives of the people living there. This has resulted in a group of approximately 30 palestinians who have continued to meet, beyond the duration of the program, to work collectively for the sake of their neighbors and the community. In tel aviv, gather partnered with zlilim, a new artists union, to begin building its tel aviv hub. The group of 20 artists have focused on developing creative strategies to make the region more democratic, inclusive, just, and peaceful. We closed out our 202 fellowship class and began recruitment for our next cohort, focused on community organized, which officially launched in 2022. We also convened our first gather advisory council, a group of 14 past gather fellows that worked closely with the gather staff to guide the direction of our vision, strategy, and programming.south asia the kitnay duur kitnay paas (kdkp) film project translates as "so far, so close" in both hindi and urdu. This border-crossing initiative charged 42 filmmakers from pakistan and india with jointly producing works that told stories of friendship between the populations. A u.s. State department funded program allowed for eight teams to work across border virtually in creating story boards, filming and editing with completion of films set to occur in 2022. The samvaad project, funded by a u.s. State department grant, taught university educators in western india to be "interfaith dialogue facilitators" for their students and communities. The initiative culminated in a day-long conference of more than 70 educators, students, artists, religious and business leaders, and peacebuilding organizations. Seeds of peace then synthesized the learnings in a handbook that was circulated among the 7,300+ members of its network, as well as peer interfaith organizations, and elsewhere.camp in mainein summer of 2021 seeds of peace offered two sessions of in person camp. Unfortunately, due to covid there were no international participants. One session, was dedicated to young people from Maine. While the other was offered to youth from New York, syracuse, and the north east corridor to boston. Youth engaged each other in dialogue across lines of difference to analyze structural and interpersonal conflict and inequalities in the us while tacking topics such as class, race, gender, power, and privilege.in each session, participants explored conflict on personal, interpersonal, and societal levels by sharing their own experiences and grappling with the differences in their respective historical narratives. The intent was not to come up with solutions or prove the validity of any one narrative. Rather it was to develop essential leadership qualities: strengthening one's voice, developing critical thinking, fostering respect and empathy, and learning how to actively listen. All with the goal of deepening participants' sense of responsibility to lead change in their communities at home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 36
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.9%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 64.6%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $13.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.12; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 15th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.9% of revenue deployed · 64.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $191K · 20 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 21/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.