Sedgefield Middle School Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821698628
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Phone
- 7046766335
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $99,499
- Expenses
- $74,656
- Assets
- $60,718
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- GINNY SLOAN (PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH WEBB (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GINNY SLOAN (PRESIDENT)
- ELIZABETH WEBB (PRESIDENT)
- MEREDITH MURCHISON (PAST PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The sedgefield pto strives to support and enhance the educational needs of our students by fostering relationships among the school, parents, teachers and administration. The pto strives to enhance the educational experience offered at sedgefield middle by developing and supporting intiatives, projects and programs that promote professional developement and provide resources to improve the educational environment. Pto activities focus on providing services and resources to sedgefield middle and membership thereof as prescribed in accordance with the nonprofit designation.
What it reported doing in 2025
In 2025-2026 the pto purchased supplies and materials to support students, including start-up school supplies for all teaching staff, technology platforms and subscriptions, additional novels, the pto funded scholarships for the Washington dc field trip, field trip meals, and student crisis needs. The pto fully funded grade level field trips for all grades. The pto purchased items to support students including , compositionbooks, supplies for art and science projects, new chromebook chargers, headphones and a mic and receiver for the gym. Campus improvements included new planters and wall decor for back to school. The pto supported spirit events with supplies, including materials for a fall festival, spring blue out event and 8th grade dance. The funds also supported professional development for the staff and administration as well as student and staff appreciation and events. Finally, funds were used to support athletics with the purchase of new uniforms, equipment, and a sports banquet. - campus and staff support: 22,254 - parent and student support: 26,960 - other staff support: 4,811 total cash support: 54,025
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 55
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 60.8%; rating input score 61
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 25%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.81; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 60.8% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $61K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.