Secu Md Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 821896987
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2018–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Linthicum, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4104877036
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $471,662
- Expenses
- $458,850
- Assets
- $394,287
- Liabilities
- $346,435
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- REBECCA SMITH (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
- CHARLOTTE OWSIANNY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- REBECCA SMITH (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR): $764,488 total reported compensation
- RODERIC FLOWERS (SECRETARY, DIRECTOR): $746,742 total reported compensation
- JANELLE BURGOYNE (DIRECTOR): $710,060 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Secu md foundations mission is to create a stronger Maryland by empowering access to education, supporting health and wellness, and serving as a catalyst for community development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Community impact grants to local nonprofit organizations support critical organization serving Maryland communities to promote access to food, healthcare and education. Secu md foundation is proud to honor our ongoing commitments through this grant program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 67
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.3%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.72 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 92.7%; rating input score 93; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 37.5%; rating input score 38; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.86; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.88; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 156%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 21.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.3% of revenue deployed · 79.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 3 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $364K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $764K · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 24 of 25 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 46/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.