Secondary Trauma Resource Center Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
463148012
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017, Form 990-N 2016
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
Phone
9136693086
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Libraries

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,822
Expenses
$48,956
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Valeri Crenshaw (President)
  • Keith Gary (Vice-President)
  • Julia Westhoff (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Valeri Crenshaw (President)
  • Keith Gary (Vice-President)
  • Patti Sosa (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To train and consult with agencies and individuals on secondary trauma prevention in order to improve retention, wellness and client service.

What it reported doing in 2017

The Secondary Trauma Resource Center (STRC) uses a public-health based model to encourage behavior change and teach strategies for individuals, supervisors, and agencies affected by secondary trauma. The unique model and curriculum are holistically-structured, setting them apart from the traditional and often ineffective self-care suggestions, in order to enhance the capacity of nonprofits so that they will improve retention and client service. During 2017, while STRC continued its programming and training, the staff and the Board came to the conclusion that the mission was not sustainable within the Greater Kansas City metropolitan area and the Board passed a resolution to dissolve the orgainzation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 85%; rating input score 85

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -915.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.6% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -40.5% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -33.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $42K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2014 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 0/100.