Second Chance Shelter
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262717351
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Boaz, AL, USA
- Phone
- 2565612411
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Animal Protection and Welfare
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $468,378
- Expenses
- $470,935
- Assets
- $45,844
- Liabilities
- $141,544
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- RICHARD D MCGEE (PRESIDENT)
- WANDA MCGEE (VICE-PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WANDA MCGEE (VICE-PRESIDENT): $16,541 total reported compensation
- TERESA A CAMP (TREASURER): $15,838 total reported compensation
- RICHARD D MCGEE (PRESIDENT): $11,769 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Operate a no-kill shelter for stray and unwanted pets. Ensure all pets are sprayed or neutered and placed in permanent home.
What it reported doing in 2023
To operate a no-kill shelter for dogs for placement in a permanent home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 9
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 99%; rating input score 99
- Program expense ratio: 95.1%; rating input score 95
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 22
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.5%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.09; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -6.9% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 99% of revenue deployed · 95.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $448K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $17K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 25 of 26 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 8 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.