Second Chance at Renewing Self Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815242228
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
North Chesterfield, VA, USA
Phone
8042230278
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Violence Shelters

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,612
Expenses
$18,966
Assets
$20,299
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Tionya Wilson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Sonja Holt (Director)
  • Aditya Bhagavatula (Treasurer)
  • Tionya Wilson (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Domestic Violence Advocacy

What it reported doing in 2025

Needs-based financial assistance resource is available to individuals who need assistance transitioning from situations of intimate partner violence. The aim is to aid in increasing self-sufficiency and independence. The HEAL Transitional Fund was created in memory of a mother and her daughter who were killed by an abusive partner, in their Chesterfield County home in May 2015. All proceeds of the HEAL Transitional Fund directly benefit our community by assisting survivors with housing, transportation, utilities and moving expenses, such as truck rental or professional movers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 3
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 2.1%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 3.6%; rating input score 4

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.07; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 65.5%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 2.1% of revenue deployed · 3.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $675 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.