Sebastopol Wranglers

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237066554
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Sebastopol, CA, USA
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,046
Expenses
$8,318
Assets
$59,243

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RON ZANETTI (President)

People named in this filing

  • DENISE SOUSA (Secretary)
  • KIM KRATTIGER (Treasurer)
  • RON ZANETTI (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sebastopol wranglers is an all breed, multi discipline, family oriented equestrian riding and driving club. We offer a variety of clinics, shows, family activities, and participate in community events to promote the breeding, education and improvement, of driving and riding horses. Our mission is the following: 1.sponsoring equestrian events undr prevailing horse show rules and guidelines for the good of the community 2.the promotion of organized club rides, and improvement of riding skills 3.the promotion of trails for riding throughout the sebastopol area and sonoma county, and the state of California 4.the promotion of social activities and/or events for the pleasure of its members and guests 5.the promotion of interest in riding for family groups and individuals 6.the promotion of and the perpetuation of good sportsmanship

What it reported doing in 2024

Sponsoring equestrian events under prevailing horse show rules and guidelines for the good of the community

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 76
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.3%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 53.9%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 7.12; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -20.6% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.