Seattle Select Baseball Club

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205007593
IRS 990 coverage
2014–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022
Location
Shoreline, WA, USA
Phone
2069407862
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Baseball, Softball

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$662,914
Expenses
$636,823
Assets
$276,253
Liabilities
$1,360

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVE SNELL (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVE SNELL (PRESIDENT): $64,917 total reported compensation
  • HAELEY MAR (DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS): $54,470 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

It is our mission to teach the game of baseball and create an environment where young baseball players can work to achieve their dreams of playing college or professional baseball.

What it reported doing in 2022

Seattle select baseball was formed to provide opportunities and exposure while competing at the highest levels of youth baseball while instilling discipline, teamwork, sportsmanship, honesty, and integrity. In the 2022-2023 season, seattle select baseball fielded teams with over 169 players. These players participated in Washington state, regional and national tournaments, winning various level titles. The seattle select baseball club capitalized on the hard work of the coaches, players, parents, and the board in the efforts to rethink and implement ways the club could continue to develop baseball players that can compete at the college and mlb levels safely. This past season, seattle select introduced an academy training program that provided players three times the amount of opportunities to train throughout the fall and winter, vastly improving players' skills and confidence. The results of developing a solid program of athletics and academics again graduated seniors with opportunities to play college baseball. Seattle select baseball club continued to revise its programs to improve the club's performance and community involvement. The club sponsors players to provide participation to kids of every socioeconomic status. As a 501(c)(3), we understand how important donations are, so we were a key sponsor of a youth sports team at the local edmonds boys & girls club.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 86% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 72
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 80.9%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.9%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.43; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 18.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 80.9% of revenue deployed · 84.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $537K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 16/100.