Seasons Soccer Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462685633
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Crown Point, IN, USA
Phone
2196145100
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$108,811
Expenses
$90,408
Assets
$77,106

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SCOTT JOHNIVAN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SCOTT JOHNIVAN (PRESIDENT)
  • KEITH CHAPMAN (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JOHN BARNEY (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

This is a recreational and a rec plus youth soccer club that is based in the lakes of the four seasons subdivision. Our in-house program is for boys and girls ages four to eleven years old. This club provides an excellent environment for our players to enjoy the game of soccer, learn basic fundamentals and create an atmosphere of good sportsmanship. All games are played on saturday mornings with a tournament at the conclusion of each season for the u8 & u11 age groups.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provide to the community an in-house soccer program for boys and girls ages four to eleven years old. This club provides an excellent environment for our players to enjoy the game of soccer, learn basic fundamentals and create an atmosphere of good sportsmanship.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 82% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Assets have declined or grown slowly and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $90K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 19 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.