Seaside Police Officers Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
271329551
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Seaside, CA, USA
Phone
8314310753
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$42,350
Expenses
$41,263
Assets
$45,713

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACOB SWEYD (President)
  • GABRIEL SUAREZ (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • HECTOR HUIZAR (Treasurer)
  • ALEX JENNINGS (Secretary)
  • JACOB SWEYD (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Purpose of the 501 (c) 5 is to promote education and and recreation of its members and the public in order to further the interest between law enforcement and the public. Provide support for members and the residents of the city of seaside in times of need. Create and maintain legal defense fund for the members as provided in the bylaws. Create and maintain a fund for the protection, care and welfare of the members in times of distress through injury, incapacity, sickness or death.

What it reported doing in 2025

The seaside police officers association protects and supports the members of the association and create and maintain relationships with the community we serve. We participate in community functions throughout the year, like national night out and bike events that all help to encourage a working relationship between the citizens of seaside and the officers that protect and serve that community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.11; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.